TALBOT RIVER PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC.
P.O. Box 2234
EASTON, MD 21601.2234
The Honorable C. Eugene Butler The Honorable Robert C. Willey
Mayor, Town of Easton President, Easton Town Council
DELIVERED BY HAND RE: MORATORIUM October 29, 1999
Gentlemen:
Our organization normally limits itself to the problem of pollution in Talbot County rivers. We have already obtained evidence showing serious impairment in the Tred Avon and other waterways.
We support orderly smart growth provided it causes no further harm to the waterways. However, the effects of what we do on land returns to the rivers as stormwater runoff. We must have growth to provide jobs. A town cannot stand still. We doubt that present road and sewage systems can softly handle a massive building boom.
The dilemma caused by the deluge of "mega box" applications has brought the planning and zoning process to a halt. It has also exposed elected officials and planning staff to a scale of problems they have not met before. For instance, it is not adequate to discuss tree planting and architectural refinement, but to ignore the larger problems of polluted waters (on which our economy depends); rapidly increasing traffic congestion; funding for sewer and highway construction; and whether the proposed location for large commercial developments will enhance, or harm, the Town and County.
We have listened to Milton Irvin, a retired developer who has also served on zoning boards. He believes the Town needs to put in place administrative techniques that are fair to landowners, developers, and residents. The key principle is that the applicant for minor projects must at his own expense submit a complete disclosure of all facts of the proposed land use at day one. Planning staff should cooperate, but not spend time on incomplete applications. By the time a zoning change or subdivision is granted, the applicant has a vested position and rights that cannot be inexpensively withdrawn or changed. Getting it right at the beginning avoids litigation.
In Montgomery County, the first submission made is a Natural Resource Inventory Map, drawn and sealed by an engineer licensed in Maryland. This includes:
1. A boundary plat of the property drawn to scale, including topography at two foot intervals
2. All water courses (including intermittent streams)
3. All specimen trees
4. Zoning
5. All setbacks
6. Zoning of adjoining properties
7. Applicable environmental regulations
8. Master Plan (Comprehensive Plan) obligations
9. Critical Area obligations
This Map, paid for by developers, becomes the basis for the Preliminary Subdivision Plan. The Plan must be in compliance with the map. Any deviations must be corrected before the Plan goes to the first stage of review. The burden of disclosure is on the developer, not the taxpayer. The developer pays full cost of the Map.
Montgomery County is more concerned with topography than with waterfront, although they do have Potomac River frontage. This County is currently discussing a bill to tax developers to assist with the cost of infrastructure required for the new developments.
Anne Arundel County has Chesapeake Bay considerations similar to ours and requires an Environmental Impact Statement as part of the initial application. They also mandate a detailed site plan for the entire tract for a P.U.D.
If the Easton Club were in either of these jurisdictions, their request to exchange seventeen single family homes for 176 multifamily units would not have been considered.
At present, Easton lacks the hard facts about the real nature and impact of 1,000,000 square feet of "mega box" construction. We have not even asked the fundamentally important questions which should be asked before any approval is given.
We respectfully request that a spokesman from T.R.P.A. be allowed to make a brief presentation to the Easton Town Council to outline our concerns about Talbot's rivers.
Recently obtained scientific evidence of hazardous substances (as defined by the E.P.A.) found in the Tred Avon demonstrate the need for better stormwater management. The current permit review of Easton's wastewater treatment plant will also, we believe, result in stricter (costlier?) treatment standards. Easton should resolve these questions before allowing massive new development.
Our group is not adversarial - has no conflict of interest - and would like to assist the Town in any way you see fit. We would welcome a "place at the table" when these matters are discussed.
Sincerely,
Callum R. W. Bain
President
CRWB:JBJ