April 19, 1999

The Town Council of the Town of Easton met today at 7:00 P.M. The meeting was called to order by the President, Mr. Willey, with the following members present: Mr. Ford, Mr. Mayer, Mrs. Clem and Mr. Heinmuller. Also attending the meeting were Mayor C. Eugene Butler, Town Engineer Hugh Grunden, Assistant Town Engineer T. Glass, Chief of Police George Harvey and Town Attorney Christopher Kehoe. Various members of the Easton Police Department were also present for promotions and awards.

The meeting was opened with prayer by Mr. Mayer. Mr. Mayer led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Upon motion by Mr. Mayer seconded by Mrs. Clem, the minutes of the April 5, 1999 meeting was approved unanimously as written.

Captain Spencer addressed the Council with the Employee of the Year Award and promotions for the Easton Police Department. The following officers were promoted to Patrolman First Class after completing the two-year probation: Martin J. Nielsen and George L. Paugh, III. Officer Paugh was not able to attend this evening.

Captain Spencer stated that for the first time, the Chief instituted an award for Employee of the Year. For Civilian of the Year, there was a tie so two people were given the award; PCO Troy Michael Stoker, a five-year employee and Supervisor of Communications and Mrs. Kay Spence, Administrator of Records, who was not able to be here tonight due to same-day surgery. Mrs. Spence, a thirteen-year employee, has subsequently been promoted to Administrative Assistant to Capt. Blue and Capt. Hobbs.

Sgt. Michael Henry, a thirteen-year veteran was awarded the Employee of the Year Award for his continued service to the Easton Police Department.

A memo from Mayor Butler was brought to the floor regarding the appointment of the Board of Canvassers for the 1999 Town of Easton General Election. The Mayor recommends the appointment of Mr. Randolph Dunham, Mr. Chester Gates and Mr. Frederic Ireland. Mrs. Clem made a motion to accept the Mayor’s recommendation for appointments, seconded by Mr. Heinmuller and carried unanimously following a roll call vote.

The President of the Council brought Resolution No. 5660, "A RESOLUTION OF THE EASTON TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADDING TO THE AREA CURRENTLY DELINEATED AS A "DESIGNATED NEIGHBORHOD" FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ("NBDP") OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT" to the floor.

The Assistant Town Planner, Mr. Lynn Thomas was present and discussed the initiation process by the state. Mr. Thomas stated that the state had suggested the expansion of the Neighborhood Business Development Program to include the HotSpot area on the west side of Easton. Mr. Thomas stated that the first step was to approve a resolution.

Mr. Mayer made a motion to pass Resolution No. 5660, seconded by Mr. Heinmuller and carried unanimously following a roll call vote.

The President of the Council brought Resolution No. 5661, "A RESOLUTION OF THE EASTON TOWN COUNCIL INDICATING LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR CERTAIN APPLICATIONS FOR STATE FUNDS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINBESS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (NBDP)" to the floor.

Mr. Thomas stated that this is the same program but actually a request to participate in that program. He stated that this is a request from Mr. Andrew and Liz Evans requesting participation in the program to help them fund their plans to buy and convert 28 N. Harrison Street into an inn and restaurant. Mr. Thomas stated that the Town’s responsibility is to identify the property in the NBDP and to pass a resolution of support, which carries no commitment.

Mr. Heinmuller made a motion to approve Resolution No. 5661, seconded by Mr. Heinmuller and carried unanimously following a roll call vote.

At 7:18 P.M., the President of the Council opened the Public Hearing on the request of Sherri Talbot, Yvonne D. Hoffman, Trustee and N. American Snake Institute, Inc. for annexation of 52 acres of land located adjacent to the existing town boundary located east of US Route 50 south of Beechwood subdivision.

Mr. Christopher Drummond, an attorney from Centreville introduced himself as representative for the Town of Easton. Mr. Drummond stated that the Town Attorney, Mr. Kehoe has a perception of a conflict of interest with respect to this annexation petition and he had been retained by the Town Clerk and Mr. Kehoe. Mr. Drummond outlined the annexation request and suggested that the resolution be formally introduced at the next meeting. Mr. Drummond suggested that the Public Hearing be carried out as advertised with the testimony from the audience and applicants as scheduled. Mr. Drummond stated that the resolution for annexation could be introduced during the next meeting and a subsequent Public Hearing scheduled for the first meeting in June to procedurally take the Town to the next step. Mr. Drummond stated that the comments taken tonight would be taken as part of the record and added, and made part of the records, to the comments and public hearing held in June.

The Town Planner, Mr. Hamilton, stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had reviewed the annexation request at their February 18 meeting from Sherri Talbot, Yvonne D. Hoffman, Trustee and N. American Snake Institute, Inc. for 52 acres of land. Mr. Hamilton displayed a map of the entire Town of Easton. He emphasized the subject area in red and reviewed the abutting properties. He stated that it is proposed to be annexed into the Town as R-10A (residential) and stated that it is compatible with the Talbot County and the Town of Easton’s Comprehensive Plans. Mr. Hamilton stated that the Town of Easton’s Planning and Zoning Commission has forwarded a recommendation to approve the annexation and further recommend that the R-10A zoning be applied to the property. He asked for any questions.

Mr. Ford questioned if the recommendation had been unanimous. Mr. Hamilton stated that it was.

The President of the Council thanked the Town Planner.

Mr. Michael Pullen, Esquire, appeared on behalf of the applicants for the annexation. He stated that the process now engaged really began with the Comprehensive Plan years ago. He stated that this parcel has been designated for residential development and is consistent with the type proposed by the developer in the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that the developer has in mind, the type of development as seen in the Matthewstown Run area which is a neighborhood, looped with streets. He stated that the name had no similarities with the type of neighborhood proposed. He asked the Council to authorize the Planning staff to review a sketch/preliminary plan in light of the procedural process indicating two public hearings. He stated that if the applicant is made to wait until June, they will loose this year. Mr. Pullen stated that Mr. Perry Otwell was present to answer any engineering questions.

Mr. Otwell stated that entry off the highway for utilities is not a problem. He stated that discussion had been held with State Highway Administration regarding traffic and deceleration. He stated that the woods in the back would try to be preserved as much as possible.

Mr. Mayer asked if there was one entrance in. Mr. Otwell answered yes. Mr. Mayer questioned where the utilities connections would come from. Mr. Otwell stated that they would come from the state highway and necessary easements would be required. Mr. Otwell stated that the utility department had expressed an interest in looping back into South Beechwood with a water line. He stated that the wires had not been discussed.

Mr. Mayer questioned Mr. Glass’s thoughts on the water and sewer connections.

Mr. Grunden, the Town Engineer and General Manager for Easton Utilities, introduced himself and stated that it is premature to talk about design with the infrastructure other to acknowledge that it is available. He stated that his staff had not reviewed any plans with respect to infrastructure improvements. He stated that typically, that would come with the subdivision and the required improvement plans as set down in the subdivision regulations.

The Town Engineer stated that technical matters had been relayed to the applicant for deficiencies with respect to the plat and the description, which are easily remedied. He stated that these deficiencies need to be corrected prior to approval of the annexation by the Council.

The President of the Council opened the floor for public comments.

Mr. Carl Reed, 29202 Holly Road, displayed a new entrance sign for South Beechwood and thanked the Council for cooperation.

Mr. Reed, President of South Beechwood was present and stated that the representatives from South Beechwood are not present for selfish reasons. He stated that their interest is in the entire Town of Easton and the residents. Mr. Reed stated that after attending the April 15 Planning and Zoning meeting regarding this annexation, he realized the development of houses in Easton, had grown from 1600 to 2076. He commented on the 1997 Comprehensive Plan and the availability of Town services for the additional population.

The President of the Council thanked Mr. Reed.

Ms. Jennifer Trumbel, 29204 Pin Oak Way, stated that most of the concerns were how fast and Easton is growing. She stated that her children are already in classrooms of 27 and 42. Ms. Trumbel stated that her concern is that Easton is growing into a Salisbury or a Glen Burnie. She stated that Easton needs to be careful about how they grow.

Ms. Mary Ellen Larrimore, 29319 Pin Oak Way, stated her concerns about traffic. She stated that it is a continuing growing nightmare. She stated that the Beechwood Association’s concerns had made the Sun Paper regarding traffic, environmental concerns and the impact of other communities. She stated that she would like to stay in Easton and feel safe and comfortable there.

Mr. Chris Davis, South Beechwood community, stated that no telephone or electric or cable services are able to adapt to this community without coming through South Beechwood. He stated his concerns regarding the traffic situation. He suggested not annexing the property and letting the developers build under Talbot County’s code.

Mrs. Clem questioned the comment regarding conversations had with the State Highway Administration about ingress and egress. Mr. Otwell stated that they are allowed one entrance along the front; typically 750’ separation with acceleration and deceleration lanes. Mr. Otwell stated that the design would not be addressed until the subdivision phase. Mr. Otwell stated that these conversations were based upon the access coordinator, Mr. Butch King’s clarifications.

Mr. Heinmuller questioned the wetlands issue. Mr. Otwell stated that a full delineation will be done and topography has been shot and the trees have been located and they will all appear on the subdivision plat. Mr. Otwell stated that they have to maintain a 25’ buffer from all non-tidal wetlands. Mr. Heinmuller asked if some of that land was not buildable. Mr. Otwell stated that was correct. He stated that he had to do a forest land delineation plan and a tree conservation plan all through the subdivision process. They will have to address all environmental, stormwater and natural resource issues.

Mr. Otwell read a letter from Butch King verifying the state’s permission to access Route 50 from the development. He clarified that this will be a 35’ access wide, fully channelized, directional right in, right out only entrance. He stated that other requirements will be required once the site plans are submitted.

Mr. Reed questioned the number of trees to be removed or left in place. Mr. Otwell stated that it was impossible to tell that until you get into the layout of the subdivision. He stated that a certain amount of trees must be on site or they must be planted during the subdivision.

Mrs. Clem questioned the concern about the open pit. Mr. Otwell stated that there used to be an old mine there; probably for gravel. Mr. Otwell stated that this will all be graded and smoothed out to present no safety hazards to residents.

Mrs. Clem questioned the effect on the South Beechwood homes. Mr. Otwell stated that it would only be touching one part of the development. He stated that the worse case scenario was that some of the lots would back up to the property line but which lots was hard to say.

Mrs. Clem generally thanked the South Beechwood community for coming forward and stating how they feel. She stated that she may not be able to give a final vote as she is not running again for Ward III but she would like to commend the community for stating their feelings. She stated that she opposed this annexation right now until the Council has an opportunity to think about the overall plans. She urged the community to keep their eyes and ears pealed.

Mr. Ford stated that regardless how the annexation ends up, everyone needs to stay involved especially when and if the property gets to the design stage. He stated that the annexation is only the first step.

Mr. Pullen explained for those not familiar with the process, this is only the first step and if this is approved, plans proposed by the developer for subdivision will be submitted for approval. At that point, there is an opportunity for continuing dialogue with the South Beechwood community which they would welcome that would result in an enhanced project which the community can be proud of.

Mr. Reed commented on the drainage problems in South Beechwood.

Mr. Dickie Barrow, 29207 Pin Oak Way, questioned the size of the pit. He stated that he was under the impression that the pit could not be filled. He stated that he likes to watch the deer, the ducks and the geese and if he can fight this, he will.

There being no further comments, the President of the Council closed the Public Hearing at 7:56 P.M. and discussed the process for the annexation.

The President of the Council asked for a consensus regarding the request to let the Planning and Zoning Commission review the site plan before Council approval. Mr. Ford replied that any appearance of expediency at this point is political suicide.

Mr. Ford made a motion that the process needs to be followed step by step and he is not in favor of letting the subdivision plans go forward prior to Council approval, seconded by Mrs. Clem and carried unanimously.

Mr. Mayer congratulated the Beechwood community on their sign.

The President of the Council discussed a memo delivered to the Council yesterday.

Mr. Grunden stated that Maryland Department of Transportation has opened a process by which proposals can be made for different transportation enhancements. He stated that the staff has developed for consideration a plan by which the rails-to-trails might be expanded. He discussed the proposal and asked for a consensus to submit the application or not submit the application. Mr. Grunden stated that this plan was for discussion only and based on past community comments. He stated that these plans are subject to modification. Mr. Grunden stated that what is proposed is the extension picking up at Tanyard Branch and the North Easton Sports Complex being the north terminus and avoiding the community of the Laurel, Judas and Plum Street area by stepping out on the RTC parcel, tying into Chapel Farms, coming up Chapel Road and having two ways to enter the North Easton Sports Complex, either Chapel Road on a yet to be constructed path or westward along Chapel Road.

Mr. Grunden stated that in the application process the state does not have a time line for consideration of the proposals. He stated that this is only an effort to get our place in line.

Mayor Butler stated that there would be a number of workshops before any phase of this is complete.

Ms. Esther Busey, Chapel Farms, asked about the concerns of the 55 homeowners in Chapel Farms and suggesting reverting back to the original plan for rails-to-trails.

Mr. Heinmuller stated that in time, the RTC property would be developed into parkland and access would be necessary.

Mr. Grunden explained the second leg where the trail intersects Idlewild Avenue, heads southward along the Cadmus property, across Dutchman’s Lane and terminates on Wayside Avenue.

The President of the Council reiterated that there is no obligation on the Town’s part and nothing would be in concrete.

Mr. Mayer discussed the cul-de-sac lots in Chapel Farms and stated that he would encourage the development of these lots.

The Town Attorney stated that the RTC property was bought at a reduced rate with the understanding that it would be used for Open Space and this would have to be resolved before those two cul-de-sacs could be developed.

The President of the Council asked for audience comments.

Mr. Jim Denny, 38 Mt. Pleasant Avenue, asked Mr. Grunden about the line-up of the trails along the Mt. Pleasant school property. Mr. Denny stated that he intends to fight for the rails-to-trails line to go back by the branch and back out. He questioned funding issues and where the money would be coming from.

Mr. Grunden stated that some things the Town has already completed could be used for leverage for our portion of the funding.

Mr. Glass stated that preliminary cost estimates were around $411,000 - $412,000.

Ms. Ann Agnello, 14 Laurel Street, spoke in opposition of the rails-to-trails in her neighborhood or in the Chapel Farms neighborhood. She suggested using the $250,000 needed for the rails-to-trails to upgrade Chapel Road.

Mr. Paul Jones, 36 Mt. Pleasant Avenue, stated he welcomes the opportunity for a subsequent hearing and asked the Council to deny the application for funding until the meeting proposed.

Ms. Elizabeth Brown, Mt. Pleasant area stated that she agrees with the previous testimonies.

Ms. Carolyn Jaffe, 412 August Street, stated that she has given a number of letters to Mr. Tim Glass in support of the straw man to get in the line-up for funding. She stated that the need is there for children that do not have the chauffeur parents to be able to get to North Easton Sports Complex. She said that they depend on their feet or bikes to get them somewhere. The other option would be to walk up Washington Street with no sidewalks.

Mr. Gary Beller, resident of Chapel Farms, stated that he views the detour on the RTC property as throwing away valuable property no matter how cheaply the purchase price was. He suggested using funds to enhance the security of the railway bed.

Ms. Margaret VanZant, 303 Laurel Street, stated that she cannot see sacrificing one community for the sake of another.

Ms. Peggy Ford, 21 Plum Street, stated that the concept of the rails-to-trails is a great idea. She felt it would be a great asset for her son to get to high school. She stated that the people hang out on the parts of the undeveloped trail. She felt it would be a positive thing for the Town of Easton.

Ms. Libby Dawkins, 11 Thorogood Lane, questioned the audience about their opposition. She asked if their concern was crime. She stated that the Town of Easton is not considered safe to live in by many people. She stated the property values have gone down and that crimes have prevented some home sales. She stated that the rails-to-trails has been an improvement in the section of Town where completed. She stated that the March of Dimes used the trail for part of their Walk-a-Thon. She asked the audience to say why they didn’t want it and let that be considered. She stated that everyone wants a better Town.

Mr. Dave Stavely, 40 Mt. Pleasant Avenue, stated that drugs and crimes are high with a significant drug problem in Easton. He stated that the best way to prevent crime is to not to encourage it. He stated that his backdoor is 75 feet from the railroad track and he doesn’t want it out his back door.

Ms. Peggy Pickall stated that she is a member of the Easton Planning and Zoning Commission. She stated that she will speak tonight as the resident first. She stated that she enjoys using the rails-to-trails and has seen it used by many nice people. She asked for research and investigation of crime on the trails before holding the project up any further. She stated that the bike trail is an asset and will enable people to get from east to west and is greatly needed as part of the future of Easton. As part of the Planning Commission, Ms. Pickall stated that the state’s smart growth objection advocates walking and biking trails as an essential part of the smart growth program as part of the road system. She asked that the natural aspects be protected when placing the trails. Ms. Pickall reiterated the community’s desire to help in the planning process.

Mr. Ford made a motion to approve the application keeping in mind the Mayor’s comments and Mr. Grunden’s comments that this design concept is certainly subject to change based on input from all portions of the community that are interested in this. He stated that the process would be to get in line for funding. The motion was seconded by Mr. Heinmuller. He stated that this motion would allow us to move forward to get funds and that would enable the Town get input.

Mr. Willey stated that if this motion should pass, no construction would take place until ample workshops and sessions be held with those concerns.

The motion was carried with Mr. Mayer dissenting.

The President of the Council called for a three-minute recess.

The President of the Council called the meeting back to order.

Captain Spencer discussed the request from the Samuel T. Hemsley Elks Lodge No. 974 Organization Day Parade on Sunday, June 27, 1999. Capt. Spencer stated that the Police Department has been working with the leadership of the lodge and they believe they have all the issues addressed. Capt. Spencer stated that the Police Department is recommending that the Council grant the permit.

Mr. Marshall Bailey, the Lodge Official stated that he came forward to thank the Easton Police Department, the Council and community for their support.

Mr. Heinmuller asked how many units were lined up for the parade. Mr. Bailey stated 29. Mr. Heinmuller wished the lodge good luck.

Mr. Heinmuller moved approval for the parade with a second by Mrs. Clem. The motion was carried unanimously.

Joe Stevens, Esquire thanked the Council for the opportunity to address the Council regarding the Radcliffe Manor annexation proposal. Mr. Stevens stated that his clients, Argonaut Land Company have been in negotiations with concerned citizens and neighbors for the past 60 days since the second public hearing. He detailed the accomplishments of these meetings. Mr. Stevens stated that the concerns for high-density development had been reconsidered. Mr. Stevens stated that an agreement had been entered into with the neighbors in good faith to do fifteen lots subdivision on the southern portion of the property of Radcliffe. He stated it is a fifteen-lot subdivision consisting of lots of two to five acres in size. He stated this is what has been agreed to privately and now they need to get approval at the Town level to get to something like that. He discussed additional characteristics of the agreement. Mr. Stevens displayed a plat and detailed the changes.

Mr. Stevens discussed meetings held with the Town Planner, the Town Engineer and the Town Attorney and stated that the negotiations had not been held in a vacuum with neighbors only.

Mr. Stevens stated that a private agreement had been reached and they intend to pursue the annexation diligently. He stated that a PUD review will be accomplished upon the purchase of the property.

Mr. Mayer asked for clarification on the map of the historic fort. Mr. Stevens stated that it was on the point or in the water, outside of any development envelope. Mr. Mayer questioned the open space on the plat and if there were plans.

Mrs. Clem questioned the advantageous of the annexation. Mr. Stevens stated that this is a designated area for annexation with a tax advantage for very little amount of services. He stated that there is limited area for this type of market.

Mr. Mayer asked if the fifteen lots would have well and septic or town sewer. Mr. Stevens stated that it was their preference to be on private septic systems.

Mr. Ford questioned the Town Attorney and Mr. Stevens regarding the differentiation between the annexation and the review process that follows as the next step in development. Mr. Ford stated that he wanted to make sure that the Town of Easton’s attorney is comfortable with this annexation agreement and that it in no way supercedes the review process not only by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council but also if there are growth allocation issues involved. He stated that this is a development that has to play by the same rules as any other development. Mr. Ford stated that an annexation is a community issue, not an issue between the owner and the people who live next door.

The Town Attorney stated that this is an agreement between the property owner, Argonaut Land Company and neighboring property owners. He stated that it is not an agreement that the Town will sign off on or be a party to. He stated that the agreement is also not one the Town could enforce if there are violations by one party. The Town Attorney stated that there is nothing in it that is inconsistent with a full and complete review according to our development and review standards on any development proposal that could eventually come out of this. The Town Attorney stated that the only way this property is being treated differently is the suggestion that lots one through fifteen shown on the plat would simply use a septic system well. He stated that these lots are much larger than usual town lots.

Mrs. Clem stated that this would be setting a different kind of precedent by allowing a property to be annexed and not using sewer and water.

Mr. Stevens discussed further how to maintain the character of the lane and the traffic issues.

Mr. Hugh Smith discussed the benefits of annexing into Town. He stated that Argonaut is very happy that they have been able to reach an agreement with the people concerned with the devolution of the remainder of his families’ property. He briefed on the history of the property. He stated that Easton should be a water-oriented town.

Mr. Dave Thompson thanked the Council for giving them the opportunity and the time to have negotiations that led to this agreement. He stated that open space was preserved along St. Michaels Road.

Mr. Tony Harrington, 7768 Radcliffe Manor Lane, discussed the agreement between the Talbot Preservation Alliance, a Countywide group working on issues like this and Argonaut. He stated that the historic nature of the farm will be maintained. He stated that they now support the annexation. He thanked the Town for giving them the time to engage in this process.

The President of the Council asked for questions or comments.

Mr. Ford stated that this property does have a railroad right of way passing through it and he hopes that when any developer comes in, they take into consideration that this is an ideal opportunity to not only to provide the residents that PUD an access to Easton Point but that allows access from the east out into the county using that railroad right-of-way.

Mr. Heinmuller stated that he was glad that the parties involved had an opportunity to sit down and work things out and go through this exercise. In cases such as this, better plans have come back than what has originally left.

Mr. Kehoe stated the Council can decide whether or not to go forward with the annexation.

Mrs. Clem stated that she would like an opportunity to look at the details. Mr. Heinmuller agreed and stated that perhaps at the next meeting he would be prepared to make a consensus decision. Mr. Ford agreed as did Mr. Mayer.

The President of the Council stated that a consensus would be taken at the May 3 meeting.

The President of the Council stated that there was a memo from the Chief of Police suggesting a change in fees for Motor Vehicle Accident reports.

Capt. Spencer briefed the Council on current procedures for motor vehicle accidents. He stated that due to some confusion, a new form has been designed to make sure nothing falls through the cracks. Capt. Spencer stated that this form puts all the information on one sheet and tells the citizens whether the accident was or was not investigated and instructs them how to obtain an accident report.

Mr. Mayer made a motion to implement Capt. Spencer’s changes in fees and procedures for the Motor Vehicle Accident reports, seconded by Mr. Ford and carried.

A letter was received from the Easton Traffic and Parking Commission requesting consideration of legislation to change two-hour parking time limitation to include the same vehicle moving from space to space every two hours.

The Town Attorney discussed the practicality of being able to enforce this request. He stated that if the Council’s inclination was to pursue this, someone from the Easton Police Department could find out from Dover, Delaware exactly what their experience is with this enforcement. The President of the Council agreed.

Mr. Richard Edwards stated that there are a number of people that abuse the two-hour parking and the retailers would like to have it addressed. He stated that the meter enforcement officers know who the offenders are.

Mrs. Clem suggested talking to the owners of the businesses to resolve the problem. Mr. Edwards stated that he preferred legislation to address the problem.

Mr. Mayer suggesting talking to Dover to see how their police department handles the problem.

Mrs. Clem questioned why everyone should be penalized for a few offenders.

Mr. Heinmuller stated that parking meters were removed so retailers would have an opportunity to have customers use the spaces. EBMA assured the Council that they would do their best to enforce it. Mr. Edwards stated that EBMA is a volunteer organization and has done a lot for Easton. He stated that it is difficult to get volunteers to act as enforcement for the Town.

Mr. Edwards stated that the offenders are usually the professional people who do not rely on the walk-in business.

Mr. Ford stated that this recommendation should be investigated.

Capt. Spencer stated that he had spoken with the meter enforcement officers and they are happy with the proposed legislation. He stated that the Department could contact Dover and see how things are worked out.

The President of the Council stated that Easton Police Department could contact Dover and get the paperwork drawn up.

The President of the Council brought a request from Andrew and Liz Evans requesting a loading zone designation of two parking spaces at 28 Harrison Street to allow patrons to unload and load their personal baggage. The President of the Council referred this matter to the Traffic and Parking Commission for a policy.

The President of the Council brought Ordinance No. 388, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE EASTON REPEALING AND REENACTING WITH AMENDMENTS SECTION 2-1.2(A) OF THE EATON TOWN CODE CHANGING THE SALARY OF THE MAYOR OF THE TOWN FROM $6,000 PER EAR TO $8,500 PER YEAR" to the floor. The President of the Council explained that this is not for standing officials; this is for the Council that may be elected after the next election.

Mrs. Clem made a motion to accept Ordinance 388, seconded by Mr. Heinmuller and carried unanimously following a roll call vote.

The President of the Council brought Ordinance No. 389, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF EASTON REPEALING AND REENACTING WITH AMENDMENTS SECTION 2-1.1(A) OF THE EASTON TOWN CODE CHANGING THE SALARY OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL FROM $3,500 PER YEAR TO $6,000 AND THE SALARIES OF MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL FROM $3,000 PER YEAR TO $5,000 PER YEAR" to the floor. Mrs. Clem made a motion to accept, seconded by Mr. Heinmuller and carried with Mr. Ford voting no.

Mr. Ford stated that he was not comfortable going forward with this as it in effect was giving himself a raise within two weeks. He stated that his negative support for this in no way should be reflected as his esteem for his colleagues.

The President of the Council brought the matter of funding for Destination Management for the Promotion of Tourism within Talbot County to the floor.

Mr. Ford stated that as he understands it, this is a funding model based on a recommendation from the County, which establishes a baseline on last fiscal year’s figures and growth in the Town’s Accommodation Tax. Mr. Ford stated that fifty percent of that growth would be directed toward the DMO.

Mr. Ford stated that he would support the fifty- percent split of the growth in the Accommodation Tax with that fifty percent going to the DMO.

Mrs. Clem stated that she had a couple of concerns especially asking what is in the best interest of Easton. Mrs. Clem stated that she sees one Councilperson having a position on the organization and wondered if a hotel/motel representative from Easton also might be on the board. She would like to see Easton represented as best it can be. The next concern is that we need to put some sort of provision for evaluating at the end of a year to be certain that once we have committed dollars for this DMO that it is actually doing what we want it do in tourism. She stated that if it isn’t, it needs to be looked at and evaluated. Mrs. Clem also stated that she would be inclined to do thirty percent instead of fifty percent.

Mr. Mayer stated that he understands that there will be an evaluation every year. Mr. Mayer stated that he would prefer to be cautious in the first year regarding funding. He stated that he feels comfortable with twenty-five percent.

Mr. Heinmuller stated that you have to pay a little more to play. He felt he could support thirty to fifty percent. He would like to say yes we can do some funds but he would like to be able to look at what is coming out of the deal. Mr. Heinmuller stated that he would like to tie some representation limitation to the DMO.

Mr. Willey stated that he would go for thirty percent of actual collections of what comes in.

Mayor Butler asked for a recap of how the money is being spent. Mr. Willey agreed.

Mr. Ford stated that one of the priorities of the DMO is to be accountable for how the money is being spent.

Mrs. Clem suggested a letter detailing our interests and concerns.

Mr. Ford made a motion to contribute fifty percent.

Mr. Mayer made a motion to contribute thirty percent, seconded by Mr. Heinmuller and carried with Mr. Ford dissenting.

Mr. Heinmuller made a motion to add an annual review sunset legislation and a letter of encouragement for the selection to be representative of the number of taxpayers in any district, seconded by Mr. Mayer and carried unanimously.

The Town Clerk was instructed to draft the letter.

The President of the Council brought Resolution No. 5662 to the floor regarding the Section 8 Voucher Housing Contract that expires April 30, 1999. He stated that contract has been received which will extend the termination to April 30, 2001. This Resolution states that the Department of Housing and Community Development has advised that Paragraph 20 of the original gives the Town the ability to cancel prior to April 30, 2001, if required and no other terms are being changed under the agreement.

The President of the Council asked for a motion to suspend rules to allow the Council to act on this Resolution tonight. Mr. Mayer moved the motion, seconded by Mrs. Clem and carried.

Mr. Mayer made a motion to approve Resolution No. 5662, seconded by Mr. Heinmuller and carried unanimously following a roll call vote.

Mr. Mayer made a motion to approve payment of invoices totaling $385,8702.82, seconded by Mrs. Clem and carried unanimously.

The Mayor clarified departure time for the ESAM meeting to be held tomorrow evening at Suicide Bridge restaurant.

The Mayor asked who would be in attendance at the North Easton Sports Complex Opening Ceremonies on Saturday.

Mr. Heinmuller congratulated the Mayor on a job well done organizing the March of Dimes Walk-a-Thon. The Mayor stated that he had a great time.

Capt. Spencer stated that for information purposes only, the Chesapeake Classic Car Club will be hosting their Fourth Annual Spring Show at the Elk’s Lodge on Dutchman’s Lane. He stated that the same club will also be hosting a similar display of antique vehicles on throughout the summer on Dover Street.

Capt. Spencer stated that the Mt. Pisgah Holy Church on Port Street will be having their convention Thursday, April 22 through Sunday, April 25. He stated that Sunday, they will hold an event at the Easton High School. EPD has recommended that they park in the vacant lot at the school.

A request has been made for a waiver for the two-hour parking restriction for residents only at the high school on April 20. A health fair will be held for the Easton High School and St. Michaels School students and there will not be sufficient parking on the parking lot to accommodate all the cars so they have asked for a waiver of the required resident only parking sticker. Capt. Spencer stated that they will have a placard inside the car to identify who they are.

A motion to waive the two-hour parking restriction for April 20 was made by Mr. Heinmuller, seconded by Mr. Ford and carried unanimously.

Capt. Spencer stated that the Christ Church is having their annual spring sale on April 22 and have asked for a waiver for all this week, including today for their workers in the area of the Christ Church. He stated that there should only be about twelve cars that will be parked in the two-hour residential only parking. He stated that they will have a placard identifying their cars in case they need to be contacted to move their cars.

Mrs. Clem asked if they could utilize South Street. Capt. Spencer stated that he believed the request was for Harrison Street.

Mr. Mayer moved the approval of the waiver, seconded by Mr. Ford and carried unanimously.

The President of the Council stated that he had an interesting reading article regarding the use of cameras for red light offenders.

Mrs. Clem reviewed the obstruction situation on Washington Street at Biery Street. She stated that there are still people that live on Wye that come out on Biery and if there is any kind of van or anything higher than a car, they cannot see around to make a left hand turn to go onto Washington Street into town. Mrs. Clem recalled Chief Harvey stating that they would look at that again and eliminate one extra space. Capt. Spencer stated that he was not aware of the situation but he will contact him regarding this.

The Town Attorney recalled that the action of the Council authorized the Town Engineer and the Chief to extend that down at least to include two spaces if they felt it was necessary to ensure appropriate visibility.

The Town Engineer stated that he would contact the Chief and visit that situation again.

Mr. Mayer stated that there was a handout in their packet regarding the police GMC vehicle that blew an engine. Capt. Spencer stated that the vehicle would not be repaired.

The Town Engineer reported on the Town side that preparations were underway for the dedication for the North Easton Sports Complex this Saturday at 10:00 A.M. He invited the public to join in the festivities.

Mr. Ford discussed his concern over amount and especially the scale of commercial development that is occurring around Easton. He referred to the six-hour Planning and Zoning Commission meeting this past week. He stated that he does not think this community is supportive of this kind of development.

Mr. Ford moved a motion to have the Town Attorney prepare a resolution that states that until there can be a review by interested parties, which would include representation from the business community, the Neighborhood Associations, the Town staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission, this Council, and any other group deemed appropriate by the Mayor and Council, that no site plan which includes a "Big Box" retail store as defined in our Zoning Ordinance be approved by this Council or considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The results of the review would in turn be incorporated into the Town’s Comprehensive Plan and would clarify the Town’s position regarding the development of these types of retail uses. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Clem.

The Town Attorney stated that a consensus should be reached whether you want to pursue this. He stated that he would report back to the Council the legal issues and how to proceed. The President of the Council stated that he would like more information. The consensus was to have the Town Attorney look into the matter.

Mr. Heinmuller reminded the Council that the east end cleanup is scheduled for May 1.

Mrs. Carolyn Jaffe thanked Mr. Ford for his motion.

Mr. Mayer made a motion to adjourn.

Mr. Leon Sampson stated that on behalf of Black & Decker, he would like to thank the Mayor for the March-of-Dimes walk.

Mr. Mayer seconded the motion to adjourn. The motion was carried unanimously.

The President of the Council adjourned the meeting at 10:25 P.M.

Town Clerk