TOWN OF EASTON, MARYLAND
August 18, 2003
President John F. Ford Councilmember Leonard E. Wendowski, Sr.
Councilmember Moonyene Jackson-Amis
Town Clerk Robert F. Karge, Town Attorney Christopher B. Kehoe, Assistant Town Attorney Sharon Van Emburgh, Town Engineer Tim Glass, Assistant Town Engineer Joe Gruber, Town Planner Tom Hamilton, Assistant Town Planner Matt Davis, Chief of Police George Harvey, Economic Development Coordinator Al Bond, candidates for Ward 1 Daniel K. Brasington and Maureen Scott-Taylor and interested citizens and members of the press.
Mr. Wendowski led the audience in prayer and Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 4, 2003 MEETINGS
Upon motion by Mr. Jensen, seconded by Ms. Jackson-Amis and carried unanimously, the minutes were approved with the following amendments:
Submitted by Ms. Jackson-Amis: amend the Executive Session minutes to reflect the detailed discussion on the issues revolving around the water and sewer allocation. Differentiate one of the projects mentioned.
Submitted by Mr. Ford: The date should be 2006 when the new water plant will be on line.
RESOLUTION NO. 5812 DESIGNATING MR. GEORGE H. ROBERTS, SECRETARY OF THE EASTON UTILITIES COMMISSION TO DECLARE ON BEHALF OF THE TOWN OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE, WITH PROCEEDS OF THE TOWN’S DEBT, EXPENDITURES TO BE INCURRED WITH RESPECT TO PROJECTS OF THE EASTON UTILITIES COMMISSION
Mr. Roberts discussed the condition of the resolution for tax exempt debt.
Ms. Jackson-Amis made a motion to approve Resolution No. 5812, seconded by Mr. Jensen and carried unanimously following a roll call vote.
RESOLUTION NO. 5813, “A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF EASTON AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH W. LEE DENNY FOR THE RIGHT TO INSTALL AN UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE AND DATA LINE
Ms. Jackson-Amis questioned a) what the rush is and b) Section 2 on page 2, which says that the Mayor, Town Clerk and any other official would be authorized to execute and deliver the license agreement. She stated that she thinks that it should state so specified and not any town official.
Ms. Van Emburgh stated that this is standard wording and the only person that will execute will be the person acting as Mayor but allows the ability for the person acting as Mayor, to execute the agreement.
The Town Engineer stated that it is ready for tonight’s meeting and they are eager to get communications set up between their office buildings. He stated that their two offices are to be inter-connected with data and communications line and they are asking permission to run lines across Erickson Drive, a public right-of-way solely at Mr. Denny’s cost and expense.
Upon motion by Mr. Jensen seconded by Mr. Wendowski, Resolution No. 5813 was carried unanimously following a roll call vote.
REPORT FROM EASTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC.
Mr. Ken Bush was present on behalf of the Easton Volunteer Fire Department. He stated he has no items to bring before the Council at this time.
MEMO FROM MAYOR WILLEY REQUESTING APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENT OF TALBOT COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION REPRESENTATIVE, BOARD OF CANVASSERS AND BOARD OF APPEALS
Mr. Wendowski made a motion to approve the Mayor’s appointments.
Ms. Jackson-Amis expressed her appreciation for the process.
Mr. Jensen seconded Mr. Wendowski’s motion which was carried unanimously.
CONSENSUS ON ELM STREET DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
President Ford discussed the joint public hearing held with the County Council concerning the Elm Street application for a PUD and growth allocation.
Ms. Jackson-Amis made a motion to approve the PUD and request growth allocation, seconded by Mr. Jensen with the caveat that this will be revisited and explained a little more to the community why it is a good idea, which was carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF INVOICES TOTALING $582,876.16
Mr. Jensen made a motion to approve the invoices, seconded by Ms. Jackson-Amis and carried unanimously.
COMMENTS FROM MAYOR WILLEY
Mayor Willey discussed the MML Fall Conference to be held in Cambridge, Maryland in October. Mayor Willey requested that participants who attend consider not staying in Cambridge due to the close proximity of the Conference.
Mayor Willey stated that President Ford will be serving as Acting Mayor while he is out of Town.
Mayor Willey discussed the bell in the old Firehouse building on Harrison Street. He stated that the Fire Department wishes to remove the bell and make it a shrine for the fallen fire fighters and police officers. Mr. Willey discussed the condition of the cupola and stated that the Rotary is discussing assisting with the project. He distributed photographs for review. Mayor Willey stated that the cupola would be restored and a bell would be put in there.
Discussion occurred on the removal of the cupola.
Mayor Willey asked Council permission to set a meeting with the Talbot County Council to discuss the east/west connector road. It was the consensus to schedule the meeting.
Mayor Willey discussed homes with renovation needs. He stated that there is a group that has offered to do a survey and set up the data base on a computer program. Mayor Willey stated that the group will be present at the September 2 meeting to discuss the process.
Mayor Willey asked that the Town Attorney schedule a workshop to discuss impact fees.
Ms. Jackson-Amis asked for a list of properties that the Town is leasing or planning to lease and their use.
Mayor discussed a study for space needs; one, two, three, five years out. He stated the project will be started in the next few weeks.
Mr. Jensen asked the status on the contract with Mr. Delaporte. Mr. Willey discussed the contract with the minor changes that have been forwarded to Mr. Delaporte.
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REQUEST OF TED OR JULIA PASSYN ON THE BEHALF OF PASSYN & PASSYN, LLC REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MATTHEWSTOWN ROAD (MARYLAND ROUTE 328) WEST OF SWANN HAVEN ROAD IN EASTON TO RECLASSIFY THE PROPERTY FROM AGRICULTURAL (A-1) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), FOR A MIXED USE PUD. THE PROPOSED PROJECT INCLUDES 539 RESIDENTIAL UNITS OF VARIOUS TYPES AND 10,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE ON 158+ ACRE SITE.
At 7:15 p.m., the President of the Council opened the Public Hearing.
The Town Planner, Mr. Hamilton briefed on the project. He stated that the project has gone through intensive Planning Commission review over a couple of years. He stated that on June 19, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this project with 14 conditions to be addressed.
Mr. Jensen asked if at each phase, the Planning Commission would review each application. The Town Planner stated that if approved, the developers will design the project with engineers then the Planning Commission will review the plats during the preliminary review when the construction and development plans are put together to ensure they are what was promised.
Mr. Richard Phillips, Esq., was present on behalf of the applicant, Passyn & Passyn, LLC. He stated that this parcel is made up of two parcels; 79 acres annexed into the Town in 1999 and 79 acres annexed in 2001 which are the two parcels the applicant is presenting tonight. He stated that the object here is to build a traditional neighborhood development. Mr. Phillips stated that the planner for the project is Mr. Ron Young, the author of the Smart Growth Plan in Maryland, former Deputy Secretary of the Department of Natural Resources, former Deputy Secretary for Planning of the State of Maryland and past Mayor of the City of Frederick for 16 years. Mr. George Young, Engineer for the project was also present.
Mr. Ron Young discussed the 158 acre project; 52 acres which will remain in open space. He stated that the average density of the developed part is 6 units per acre. He stated that 3.5 is the accepted level under Smart Growth. He presented the Community Center, to be built as part of the project. He stated it will have a pool, a small business conference area and a technology center. Mr. Young stated that this type of community reduces the number of trips per day. He discussed the view on Matthewstown Road. Mr. Young presented views of the project and samples of the houses. He stated that there are 539 units on 158 acres and that 1/3 of the houses in the community are within the FHA limits for affordability and in the reach of Easton’s working families. Mr. Young stated that there is a real attempt to not just do a housing project but to build a community where the working families of Easton can live.
Mr. Young displayed the ten standard Smart Growth principals and stated that the farmlands and open space are being saved by developing compactly.
Mr. Young stated that the Passyns have offered to the Board of Education, 42 ½ acres for an environmental outdoor education center which will be put in land trust should the Board of Education opt not to take the land.
Mr. Young stated that the Passyns have proposed a self-imposed impact fee to be directed towards needs found in the community. He stated that they are proposing a $500 per building fee, totaling $269,500 when build out for the stabilization and revitalization of designated neighborhoods, another $500 per building permit for transportation fund for improvements to the roads, $500 per building permit for business development to assist in bringing business to Easton for new or expansion of existing business, $500 per building permit for a school fund to go to the Board of Education, $500 per building permit to the Fire Department or $150,000 up front and $500 per building permit to go to the Easton Memorial Hospital to assist them in their efforts. Mr. Young proposed a total of six neighborhood funds for a total of $3,000 self-imposed impact fee per building permit for a total impact fee of $1,617,000 for offsite improvements to the community.
Mr. Young displayed a layout of the development. He stated that he has worked with a lot of developers and the Passyns have developed a great community.
Mr. Ford asked what the age restriction housing would be. Mr. Young stated that the restriction would be 55 years or older to live there and strictly residential.
Mr. Ford stated that there is no vehicular connection with the established Matthewstown Run development due to the topography. Mr. Young stated that there is a walk and biking path but not an automotive connection.
Ms. Jackson-Amis asked for numbers of houses.
Mr. Ted Passyn, Jr., stated that the houses proposed for the 40’ wide lots within the FHA limits will start at $153,000.
Mr. Jensen asked the price of the three-story town homes. Mr. Passyn stated that the projection is $180,000 to $190,000 and the two-story town homes may fall within the FHA limits also, closer to $165,000 to $175,000 range. Mr. Passyn discussed the amenities which may be included in the town homes making them more expensive than the single family homes on 40’ lots.
Ms. Jackson-Amis discussed reducing the price of homes in order to qualify for conventional mortgages. She questioned if there was any possibility of reducing the homes to allow for mortgages other than FHA. Mr. Passyn stated that he would have to revisit the architectural amenities. Mr. Passyn discussed road improvements.
Mr. Jensen stated that he believes the east/west connector road needs to be in place by the time people start to move into Two Oaks. Mr. Jensen stated that his support would be predicated on seeing that road is going to happen. Mr. Passyn asked that this be deferred to Mr. Schmee, the transportation expert. Mr. Passyn stated that they are willing to work with the Town and County and would consider stepping up to the plate sooner with the $269,000.
Ms. Jackson-Amis discussed the generous offerings and questioned affordable housing. Mr. Passyn discussed the allocation for neighborhood fund of $500 per building permit to be used for existing neighborhoods in need in Easton. Ms. Jackson-Amis stated that instead of a dollar amount, would the developer be willing to consider refurbishing or building homes off-site. Mr. Passyn stated that they are willing to contribute to that whether in a home or through funding. She appreciated the opening for discussion on the matter.
Mr. Ken Schmee, Traffic Concepts located in Gambrills, Maryland stated that they have been working with the Passyns for18 months. He stated that they separated the traffic issues into three major areas. The first is site access; the second is traffic impact study and the third issue is the more long range transportation needs of the east side of Easton getting to the west side of Easton.
Mr. Schmee discussed the site access on Matthewstown Road. He stated that SHA is opposed to putting up a traffic light. He discussed the dual access where 2/3 of the traffic will use the main access point which will be dualized and be the focal point of the development and the secondary access will handle 1/3 of the traffic which will help minimize the impact on Matthewstown Road and better distribute the traffic around the site. He stated that SHA agreed to the access layout, the separation of the access points. Mr. Schmee discussed the construction of additional lanes.
Mr. Jensen questioned what will this do to the existing Matthewstown Run/Golton intersection and will that need a light? He asked if Mr. Schmee has looked at development up and down Matthewstown Road as far as Denton to see if a traffic light is needed.
Mr. Schmee stated that the ability to put a traffic light in place is strictly up to State Highway to approve.
Mr. Schmee discussed putting a condition on the approval stating that when the traffic and State Highway Administration warrants a signal, the developer would incur the cost of signalization. He discussed the regional fund to do impacts where there is a visible need for money to secure rights-of-ways or studies.
Mr. Wendowski stated that what is being said is that there is the potential for two or more traffic lights on that road so they could start looking like the Parkway.
Mr. Schmee stated that it is likely that there will be more lights in the future on that road. He discussed volume based density type of signal system and stated that you don’t need to add lanes but could get 10 or 15% better efficiency of the intersections. He discussed the associated costs.
Mr. Schmee stated that they have tried to address the side road approaches and the backing during peak times back into town. He stated that this will basically be addressed by doing widening across the CVS property, widening across the Pizza Hut property and do a widening across Miller’s Auto Sales and Repair and tie the additional lane into the existing right turn lane that drops onto Elliott Drive with the idea to preserve that free right turn lane and provide two lanes to come across the intersection. Mr. Schmee stated that the intersection will be better with their improvement than without the development.
Mr. Jensen discussed the problem and traffic on Goldsborough Street. He stated that it cannot take anymore traffic.
Mr. Schmee stated that the developer cannot address the more long term regional planning needs of a town or system. He discussed buying rights-of-ways of Pizza Hut and CVS.
Mr. Jensen asked if there was a configuration that was better, would the developer consider contributing to that. He stated that they can only participate monetarily towards the goal.
Mr. Roger Bollman, 221 S. Hanson Street, discussed the draft Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Bollman stated that if it had not been annexed, it would not be before the Council now. He suggested that this project relies on infill and this project violates this and does nothing to control the rate of development in the town. He asked the staff to prepare how this project complies with the Draft Comprehensive Plan in order to make an objective decision. Mr. Bollman stated he shares the Council’s concern regarding traffic. He discussed the effect of major construction projects on creeks and rivers and stated there will be a major run off. He discussed above standard requirements. He urged the Council to review the amount on the table the developer proposes to contribute.
Ms. Joyce Scharch, 601 Goldsborough Street, discussed the traffic on Goldsborough Street. She stated that she feels the Ocean City traffic gets the priority and suggested better timing for the red lights. Ms. Scharch stated that she was impressed by the developers’ plans.
Mayor Willey stated that Mr. Glass is taking Ms. Scharch’s comments under advice to direct comments to the State Highway Administration regarding the timing on the lights.
Mr. Tom Alspach stated that he is present on behalf of Talbot Preservation Alliance. He addressed the traffic issue. He asked the Council to bear in mind the trips per household generated by the development. Mr. Alspach stated that this project itself will increase Easton’s population more than 10%. He discussed the traffic report done by the developer and counts in May. Mr. Alspach discussed the traffic counter on Route 50 and stated that the traffic increased 12% from 2001 and 18% from 2002 not the 4% assessed in the study. Mr. Alspach distributed a summary report of levels of serve for US Route 50 including MD 328 during the summer peak period prepared by State Highway Administration by the request of the County Council. He discussed the impact of an approved Hampton Inn at the Miller’s Body Shop site or an office complex near the trucking company. Mr. Alspach stated that this traffic plan needs a lot of work based upon what is heard this evening. He discussed impact fees for neighboring communities and affordable housing in the community. Mr. Alspach stated that there is some commendable parts about this project but with a lot of room for improvement. He stated that it is premature for the project to be approved at this time.
Mr. Daman Kellum stated that he teaches in Talbot County and likes what the developer has put forth. He appreciates the support for the school system. He stated that some of the ongoing problems were here before this project and he is hearing that the developer wants to work with the community to ease those problems. Mr. Kellum stated that he support this project.
Ms. Margaret Ledum, Elizabeth Street, stated that her biggest concern is the traffic. She asked the Council to think about the traffic and she doesn’t really think another development on Matthewstown Road is needed.
Ms. Ann Johnson, 8503 Swann Haven Road, stated that she lives behind Mr. Passyn’s development. Ms. Johnson stated that there are several problems in that area; one of which is the traffic flow and runoff that develops during rainstorms from a creek that empties into the Choptank River. She stated that she is totally against any other development where there are more houses and cars.
Mr. Gene Mechling, 222 S. Washington Street, stated that he is concerned about the process as he feels this is the first time the public has had a chance to see the project. He stated that the public is coming into the project at the end which he feels is wrong. Mr. Mechling suggested bringing the public into the process earlier on so these concerns can be discussed within the community. Mr. Mechling asked where the impact studies are which should go with a project such as this. He commended the developer for contributing impact fees without even knowing what the associated costs may be.
The President of the Council asked for additional public comments.
Mr. Jensen stated that one of the problems of this project is that it does not connect well with Easton. He questioned architecture on the town homes. He asked if buyers would have more choice with colors and materials to get an individual development. Mr. Jensen asked if other builders could build in the development in order to get more variety.
Mr. Passyn discussed Planning Commission’s recommendations for color and architecture choices. He stated that they have not entertained other builders but they would entertain the suggestion.
Mr. Jensen discussed the satisfaction of homeowners in Matthewstown. He asked what type of warranties would be offered.
Mr. Phillips discussed the issues that went forward with the homebuilder’s organization that approves the licensing. He stated that the process involved there resulted in their license being renewed. Mr. Phillips stated that issues raised had not occurred during the licensing period and most had evaporated in the sands of time and people who had called really weren’t complaints but inquiries. Mr. Phillips stated that a $200,000 bond has been provided to protect everyone that Passyns’ build for as a methodology to be sure all of those people are protected. Mr. Phillips stated that Passyns have brought in a segment of homebuyer that did not exist in this county.
Mr. Jensen asked for assurance that this could not happen again.
Mr. Phillips stated that as compared to other developers, they built 400 homes in this county and they strive to be as good as they can be. He stated a quality product is provided at a reasonable price.
Mr. Jensen asked if the bonding process was voluntary. Mr. Phillips stated it was accomplished at his suggestion after the complaints were addressed. Mr. Jensen asked for the procedure for the bond to be tapped into if there is a problem. Mr. Phillips discussed the mediation process or the warranty company. Mr. Phillips stated he will forward a copy for his review.
Mr. Schmee responded to Mr. Alspach’s comments regarding the traffic impact study. He stated that he has been working in the traffic engineering field for 22 years. He discussed the information attained. Mr. Schmee stated that the traffic impact study Mr. Alspach referred to that the State Highway Administration did was a long range traffic engineering planning study at barebones cost by the State. He stated that roads systems cannot be designed for the worse day of the year.
Mr. Wendowski asked for a copy of the traffic report.
Mr. Ron Young stated that he helped write the guidelines for the state regarding density. He stated that the density referred to is interpreted the correct way excluding public property. Mr. Young discussed smart growth and the criteria to meet. Mr. Young discussed developing the property the smart way versus developing what is currently allowed. He discussed the amount of growth coming. He discussed the balance in affordability and attractive, average developments. He discussed balance costs points, costs incurred and the prices of homes.
The President of the Council stated that the real concern that the applicant needs to consider is Ms. Jackson-Amis’ feelings that the affordable housing commitment needs to be stronger on site. He commended the Planning Commission and the Town staff for good cooperation and good planning and the applicant. Mr. Ford stated that there are a number of concerns on the impact this community will have as a whole and what is fair compensation for those projected impacts.
Mr. Ford stated that written record will be kept open until the end of business Friday. He stated that the Council may not reach a consensus at the next meeting.
Mr. Wendowski stated that the when the original application was submitted, it was 488 homes. He stated that now it is 539 homes with a 41 home increase. Mr. Wendowski asked where the additional homes came from.
Mr. Passyn discussed the two pieces of property. He discussed working through staff with the mixed change of the homes. He stated that following the smart growth standards, the increase of homes was not a concern of the staff and Planning Commission. Mr. Passyn stated that although the application changed, they felt the development was better.
Mr. Wendowski asked for sizes and renderings.
Mr. Hamilton discussed the density. He stated that the developer was told to mix up the lots and give more of the lower priced units.
Mr. Wendowski stated that he sees a lot of favorable things in this plan but he thinks a full Council as well as additional meetings are needed before a decision is reached.
Mr. Ford stated that if there are particular pieces of this application with that can be addressed or improved upon, they should be clearly stated to the applicant at the next meeting so they can respond.
Mr. Jensen stated that he appreciates the work that has been done on this project but there is a lot of work to be done.
At 9:24 p.m., the President of the Council closed the public hearing.
COMMENTS BY CHIEF OF POLICE
Chief Harvey had the following requests for approval:
Mr. Jensen made a motion to approve the Chief’s requests, seconded by Mr. Wendowski and carried unanimously.
COMMENTS FROM TOWN ENGINEER
The Town Engineer, Mr. Glass reported that the contractor will be relocating gas lines at the old gas plant there by Wednesday or Thursday in preparation of MDE (Maryland Department of Environment). He stated there will be minor disruptions for approximately four weeks.
Mr. Glass discussed ongoing street reconstruction. He stated that they are finished with maintenance paving.
Mr. Glass stated that weather permitting, Public Works is still spraying for mosquitoes at least once a week.
Mr. Glass stated that State Highway Administration was out last week looking at the Hawkes Hill entrance and did find a lot of activity going on. He stated that they are looking heavily at what will be an appropriate response.
Mr. Jensen thanked everyone for working on the area. Mr. Glass stated that any assistance directed to the State Highway Administration would only move things faster. Mr. Jensen asked if there was a consensus to address a letter to State Highway Administration addressing the problem on Hawke's Hill. It was the consensus for Mr. Jensen to draft a letter for the member of the Council to review and sign.
Mr. Glass stated that the design for the million gallon tank in the Clifton area has been finalized and is out to bid. He stated that they intend to make a decision on a contract around mid October 2003 with construction taking 12 to 14 months.
Mr. Glass stated that his office is actively working with Chief Harvey and his staff with regards to truck routing. He stated that a definitive plan will be forthcoming.
Mr. Glass discussed timing for Route 50 lights and stated that he will be in touch with State Highway Administration this week.
Ms. Jackson-Amis asked what the route is for mosquito spray. Mr. Glass stated that they spray when the wind is less than 10 miles per hour and there are license requirements or labeling restrictions they must abide by. He stated that they fog main streets and alleys to get gutters and standing puddles. Ms. Jackson-Amis asked the Town Engineer to report the concerns in the Fourth Ward as she is constantly getting inquiries.
Mr. Jensen asked how Easton Utilities would fare through blackouts. Mr. Glass stated that the PJM power grid that they are connected to was able to disconnect itself from that catastrophe ahead of time. Mr. Glass stated that Easton has full backup generation capabilities and the ability to provide electricity for all of the customers in town should they get disconnected.
COMMENTS FROM TOWN ATTORNEY
Ms. Van Emburgh discussed a memo she distributed for Executive Session discussion. She asked the Council to review for discussion at a future meeting.
COMMENTS FROM MAYOR WILLEY
Mayor Willey suggested instructing the Park Board that future reservations at the Town Parks should not allow vehicles to be driven over to the picnic areas.
Mayor Willey reminded those present of the Comprehensive Plan public hearing scheduled for August 21. He stated that this is also Easton night at the Shorebirds game. He suggested representation at the game.
COMMENTS FROM THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
Mr. Bond asked that a date be set for the Community Legacy Workshop where ranking is considered for the projects.
The President of the Council set the workshop for September 2 at 6:00 p.m.
Mr. Bond stated that he will introduce the projects to the councilmember-elect prior to the workshop.
COMMENTS FROM THE COUNCIL
The President of the Council announced that the new council position will be filled at the next meeting. He reminded everyone that the polls will be open for the Ward 1 election August 25 from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the Easton Fire House.
Mr. Jensen asked Chief Harvey to forward him information regarding accidents in the Hawke's Hill area for information to include in his letter to State Highway Administration.
Ms. Jackson-Amis stated that she has met with two citizens who have been active with affordable housing. She stated that they had two good suggestions regarding how money would be handled that could be utilized for affordable housing. She stated that she suggested that they contact the Mayor.
Ms. Jackson-Amis acknowledged a letter from Mr. Leonard Williams after the joint public hearing. She stated in the context of the hearing, the Council did address the issues dealing with the impact on St. Michaels Road Elm Street property and there is more consideration being given to handle the traffic and the east/west connector that has been discussed today. She thanked Mr. Williams for his concerns.
President of the Council Mr. Ford reminded everyone of the Public Hearing scheduled for August 21 at 7:00 p.m. regarding the Draft Comprehensive Plan for Easton.
Mr. Ford encouraged Easton residents to also attend the Shorebirds Easton night.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
Ms. Shanahan asked that clarification be made regarding the upcoming election for Ward 1. She stated that residents in the Shireton at 117 E. Dover Street are now in Ward 4 due to redistricting. She expressed her concern regarding the desire to vote in Ward 1 and public notification of the new assigned ward for the residents of 117 E. Dover Street.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, upon motion by Jensen, seconded by Mr. Wendowski and carried unanimously, the President of the Council adjourned the regularly scheduled meeting at 9:45 P.M.
______________________________________
Town Clerk